Hi Ennio !!!! ...
Thanks for your prompt response!!!!...
But no, there are no connected capacitors ... since the disconnection that I indicated in the first question of there is fed into the capacitor bank ... that is to say that the secondary of the entire company's traffic is disconnected.
My question is that if the main or measurement (of the energy company) could be damaged and indicate a low power factor.
A doubt, the meter is connected before the transformer or after the transformer .. ??? It is necessary to know this, since a transformer in vacuum or with very little load, connected to the network, has very low power factor.
Ennio ... thanks again !!!
I leave you a link of the very simple diagram of the installation with which I have problems:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQyllR_UIAEMd4Z.jpg
As additional information, the traffic is about 500KVA, the load I handle is 250A when all the machines are running, the average most used load is 60A .. and in the nights as I mentioned before, only lights and server.
Thank you in advance for your answer!!!
Regarding the queries, it should be a query by topic, like this one. If you have not solved the problem, you should wait for other colleagues to respond and not ask another question on the same topic.
From the problem posed, the compact of measurements, is taken before the transformer, so a new compensation calculation must be made when everything is disconnected, unless the FP correction bank is automatic.
Discuss what the capacitor bank looks like.
Thanks Ennio ... I will take into account the comment regarding the queries ...
Returning to the topic of the consultation:
The capacitor bank is automatic, when I disconnect everything from the distribution board, absolutely everything is de-energized and the meter of the supply company indicates a factor of 0.09.
That's why my doubt: in other companies, having even more machines, when disconnecting all the FP is 1.
If the bank is connected, what you mentioned is correct, that the FP should be as close to 1.
Check if the indicated value with everything disconnected says LEAD (advance) or LAG (delay).
Being capacitive will mark LEAD and being inductive, will mark LAG.
Since there is a phase without load, the bank may not work.
From what you say, an individual correction should be made only to the 2 phases of what is connected.
That's right...
But my question still continues:
Why do I have a bad power factor with everything turned off?
what should i do? what steps should i follow?
I have called supposed specialists and the only thing they want to sell me is a new capacitor bank ... but my problem is not the capacitor bank, the problem is when I have nothing connected ... I take everything out of service to the bank ...
Hi Ennio, the issue is not that the power factor controller is damaged, poorly calibrated or poorly designed, the problem is that with a very low load on the transformer, it maintains a power factor of 0.3 ... and with all disconnected 0,09 ... what could be the reasons? (This measurement is in the energy meter of the supplier (enel - Chile)
As I mentioned before, the transformer has very bad FP when it is empty. This happens when you disconnect everything from the distribution board.
Apart from this, there is the problem that with a low load, you have a phase without load, so the bank does not correct since that phase would practically remain with FP 0 (zero).
This is because the relationship between reactive power and active power is very high. Not so in operation that as the active power increases, the ratio decreases.
My opinion is that you must leave the distribution panel connected, so that the capacitor bank is energized.
And apart make a correction to the 2 phases that remain with load for the days that the plant does not work.
Another possibility is that they distribute the loads in the phases, so that the one that is left without load takes charge and so the bank can act.
Thanks Yonaldopc !!!
From the little I remember of transformers, the greatest losses are found when the secondary is empty, so I think that the power factor is due to this added to what you indicated ... can this be the theoretical basis that Can I enter into a conversation with the company that supplies the electric service?
No. How to insert a new response to the colleague, but in some countries, it is possible to hire several readings in the meter meter, I have seen up to three rates (day, afternoon / night and peak). You could negotiate with your administrator because you do not have how to control the reading by discharge, so you may not be able to consider what was consumed during off hours. I don't know what country you are in or what is regulated there ... Good luck
Thanks YonaldoPc ... indeed the problem is that the traffic is used at a capacity of less than 15% of its nominal power ...
The most suitable solution is to calculate the invoice of how much KVAR I need to compensate, place it in the secondary of the traffic without it being controlled or measured by the capacitor bank.
Thanks to the comments of this Post, place a capacitor calculated to correct the FP of the traffic (which I remind you that it works at less than 10% of its capacity). This 30KVR capacitor is placed in the secondary of the transformer before the capacitor bank, so that it corrects the power factor produced by the transformer and the capacitor bank is responsible for correcting any variation of the additional inductance that can be charged in the system .